'The Swarm' Is A Multi-Rotor Copter Capable Of Carrying A Person | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.10.24 Airborne-Unlimited-04.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.12.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Oct 08, 2015

'The Swarm' Is A Multi-Rotor Copter Capable Of Carrying A Person

Forty-Six Rotors Provide Sufficient Lift For Manned Flight

If this were on a TV show like "Mythbusters" or "What Could Possibly Go Wrong" ... it would come with a the disclaimer "Don't try this at home." But A British man did try it at home ... and has taken the multi-rotor copter concept to the extreme.

YouTube user gasturbine 101, whose first name is apparently Paul based on comments on the YouTube page, has taken 54 electric motors and 18-inch rotors and built an aircraft he can fly.

He dubbed the aircraft "The Swarm."

According to the YouTube video description, the aircraft cost the tinkerer about $9,000 to build, and he says he never intends to fly it more than about head-high.

"54 chosen as this fits the hexagonal close pack layout. 6 more could be added in the center," he writes. "18 in props at 5000 rpm though hazardous, are still much less so than 6, 5 ft ones. Where could you get a low power 5ft prop from weighing less than 1Kg with opposite pitches? The 54 gives good redundancy as mechanical and power electronic systems are the main failure areas. I have had one ESC randomly fail already. Controls could be made fully redundant (9 x KK2.15s) so only the control sticks (and pilot) are single failure points. Redundancy increases the [likelihood] of failure but reduces the consequences."

Just in case one of those props comes off, there is a cockpit canopy protecting his head.

While the aircraft can be seen taking off and landing several times, it apparently is not as maneuverable as the inventor would like. "No one has spotted the biggest flaw! That is the large number of props running at high speed means the net torque reactions are relatively low, so the craft has little yaw authority. So it probably needs a tail rotor for spot turns," he writes.

One commenter recommends that he put floats on the aircraft to make it an amphib. Paul, we salute your ingenuity.

The video has received over 3.5 million views since being posted on August 29th. Go ahead, add another.

(Image from YouTube video)

FMI: Video

Advertisement

More News

Classic Aero-TV: The Switchblade Flying Car FLIES!

From 2023 (YouTube Versions): Flying Motorcycle, That Is… "First Flight was achieved under cloudy skies but calm winds. The Samson Sky team, positioned along the runway, wat>[...]

ANN FAQ: Q&A 101

A Few Questions AND Answers To Help You Get MORE Out of ANN! 1) I forgot my password. How do I find it? 1) Easy... click here and give us your e-mail address--we'll send it to you >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.12.24): Discrete Code

Discrete Code As used in the Air Traffic Control Radar Beacon System (ATCRBS), any one of the 4096 selectable Mode 3/A aircraft transponder codes except those ending in zero zero; >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.13.24): Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS)

Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.13.24)

Aero Linx: Florida Antique Biplane Association "Biplanes.....outrageous fun since 1903." That quote really defines what the Florida Antique Biplane Association (FABA) is all about.>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC