FAA Sued In Connection With 2015 Accident In North Carolina | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.10.24 Airborne-Unlimited-04.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.12.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Nov 22, 2017

FAA Sued In Connection With 2015 Accident In North Carolina

Says Controllers Received Insufficient Training In Recognition And Handling Of Emergencies

The estate of Michael M. Apfelbaum and his wife, Christine have filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the FAA in connection with an accident which occurred September 4, 2015 that fatally injured the couple.

The Apfelbaums and Christine's father were aboard a Beechcraft A36 Bonanza attempting an instrument landing at Piedmont Triad International Airport in Greensboro, NC when the accident occurred. Michael Apfelbaum was the PIC of the airplane. In its probable cause report, which is not admissible in court, the NTSB determined that the accident was likely caused by the pilot's spatial disorientation during the approach, but also said that the controllers lacked sufficient training to recognize and handle emergency situations.

The report said that "incorrect controller actions likely aggravated" the spacial disorientation. "The FAA training did not properly prepare the controllers involved in this accident to recognize and effectively respond to disorientation scenarios," the report states. The plane stalled and spun into the ground after a controller told the pilot to climb, according to the report. All three on board were fatally injured.

Penn Live reports that the estates are seeking unspecified damages in the suit, including lost earnings. The court documents indicate that controllers did not correct the pilot's incorrect reading of his heading, and his statement that he was disoriented was not recognized as an emergency. The suit contends that the controllers should have told him to level the wings and then climb out of the clouds.

(Image from file. Not accident airplane)

FMI: Original report

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.13.24)

Aero Linx: Florida Antique Biplane Association "Biplanes.....outrageous fun since 1903." That quote really defines what the Florida Antique Biplane Association (FABA) is all about.>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.13.24): Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS)

Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]

Airborne 04.09.24: SnF24!, Piper-DeltaHawk!, Fisher Update, Junkers

Also: ForeFlight Upgrades, Cicare USA, Vittorazi Engines, EarthX We have a number of late-breaking news highlights from the 2024 Innovation Preview... which was PACKED with real ne>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.14.24)

“For Montaer Aircraft it is a very prudent move to incorporate such reliable institution as Ocala Aviation, with the background of decades in training experience and aviation>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.14.24): Maximum Authorized Altitude

Maximum Authorized Altitude A published altitude representing the maximum usable altitude or flight level for an airspace structure or route segment. It is the highest altitude on >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC