Stimulus Sparks Debate Over O'Hare Expansion | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

** AIRBORNE 05.21.13 Aero-TV-- CLICK HERE! ** HD iPad-Friendly Version -- AIRBORNE 05.21.13 **

** AIRBORNE 05.17.13 Aero-TV-- CLICK HERE! ** HD iPad-Friendly Version -- AIRBORNE 05.17.13 **

** AIRBORNE 04.01.13 SPECIAL EDITION of Aero-TV-- CLICK HERE! ** HD iPad-Friendly Version -- AIRBORNE 04.01.13 SPECIAL EDITION **

Sun, Feb 08, 2009

Stimulus Sparks Debate Over O'Hare Expansion

Rep. Jackson Voices Opposition To Using Taxpayer Money For OMP

Congressman Jesse Jackson, Jr. (D-IL) spoke out Friday against Republican colleague Mark Kirk's comments in the Chicago Tribune suggesting that Illinois' share of the Stimulus Package be used to expand O'Hare. Rep. Kirk voted against the Stimulus Package that would bring $22 billion to Illinois and instead suggested that the government fully fund the $20 billion O'Hare Modernization Program.

"At a time when citizens all throughout our state are in desperate need of an economic life raft, Congressman Kirk's plan leaves our citizens stranded at O'Hare," said Rep. Jackson.

"The Stimulus Package approved by Congress would bring $22 billion to Illinois to modernize schools, repair roads, improve hospitals and put people to work. Congressman Kirk prefers giving that money to the O'Hare Modernization Program -- thus depriving children, seniors and needy people of vital services."

Rep. Jackson went on to say, "There is a better alternative for adding 100,000 flights per year to Illinois. O'Hare expansion will cost $20 billion. The proposed Abraham Lincoln National Airport would add the same number flights for a fraction of the cost -- about $500 million. And that money comes from private investors -- not taxpayers."

Work on the next phase of the O'Hare expansion has not begun and funding for the $20-billion Program has not been secured. Critics of the plan cite FAA studies, which show the expansion would not provide any significant improvement of airline delays or alleviate congestion at O'Hare.

Aviation experts say that OMP will instead produce massive delays and increase costs for both consumers and airlines during and after initial construction. In addition, the airlines, including United Airlines and American Airlines, have called the OMP plan "ill-conceived" and "premature."

FMI: www.ohare.com, www.stop-omp.org

Advertisement

More News

X-47B Accomplishes Its First Ever Carrier Touch And Go

Maneuver Performed Aboard CVN 77 The Navy's X-47B Unmanned Combat Air System Demonstrator (UCAS-D) began touch and go landing operations aboard the aircraft carrier USS George H.W.>[...]

Honeywell's New HTF7350 Engine To Power Bombardier Challenger 350

HTF7000 Series Surpasses 1.5 Million Flight Hours With Better Than 99 Percent Dispatch Reliability Honeywell has announced that its HTF7350, the latest engine to join its successfu>[...]

Airborne 05.21.13: Cirrus Chute Fails, NASA Record, More NIMBY Nonsense

Also: PC-12 Record, Maule Nation, Cockpit Lockout, 34,000 Airliners Needed, Beechcraft Wins Big Contract You know you're having a bad day when a flight goes so bad that you feel yo>[...]

Helo Crew Missing From Vietnam War Accounted For, Interred At Arlington

Four Buried As A Group May 2 A Navy Pilot, missing from the Vietnam War, has been accounted-for and was buried with full military honors along with his crew. According to the Depar>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.21.13)

Forest Service Smoke Jumpers Smokejumping was first proposed in 1934 by T.V. Pearson, the Forest Service Intermountain Regional Forester, as a means to quickly provide initial atta>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2013 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC