Sullenberger Disputes Automation Role In Hudson Ditching | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

** AIRBORNE 05.21.13 Aero-TV-- CLICK HERE! ** HD iPad-Friendly Version -- AIRBORNE 05.21.13 **

** AIRBORNE 05.17.13 Aero-TV-- CLICK HERE! ** HD iPad-Friendly Version -- AIRBORNE 05.17.13 **

** AIRBORNE 04.01.13 SPECIAL EDITION of Aero-TV-- CLICK HERE! ** HD iPad-Friendly Version -- AIRBORNE 04.01.13 SPECIAL EDITION **

Tue, Nov 17, 2009

Sullenberger Disputes Automation Role In Hudson Ditching

New Book Praises A320 Engineers For Aircraft Design

In his new book "Fly by Wire", author William Langewiesche says the Airbus A320 has a level of automation that "will intervene to keep people alive," But Captain Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger, the pilot in command of flight 1549, said its impact on the outcome of the incident was "minor".

Capt. Chesley Sullenberger

Sullenberger and his co-pilot Jeff Skiles have played down the "hero" aspect of the flight, saying that they simply did what they were trained to do. But in responding to the book, Sullenberger says whether it was the highly-automated A320 or a more conventionally-controlled Boeing, the outcome would have been the same.

The New York Times reports that Sullenberger said there is plenty of credit to go around for saving all 155 people onboard the aircraft, but that the automation systems on the aircraft were not primarily responsible for their safety. He said Langewiesche "greatly overstates how much it mattered," and that “(o)thers in the industry knowledgeable about these technical issues know there are misstatements of fact in ‘Fly by Wire’.”

“There are some situations where the automation will protect a pilot, but at the same time a highly automated airplane makes possible other types of errors, so it’s a mixed blessing,” Sullenberger told the Times. “And greater knowledge is required to fly a highly automated aircraft.”

Photo Credit Gregory Lam

The NTSB has yet to rule on the cause of the accident, but Dan Sicchio, a US Airways pilot who represented the pilots’ union in the investigation, said when it does, it is likely to point to "flaws in this design," some of which may have made the landing more difficult for Sullenberger.

Langewiesche, for his part, said he was "mystified" by Sullenberger's reaction to the book.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

X-47B Accomplishes Its First Ever Carrier Touch And Go

Maneuver Performed Aboard CVN 77 The Navy's X-47B Unmanned Combat Air System Demonstrator (UCAS-D) began touch and go landing operations aboard the aircraft carrier USS George H.W.>[...]

Honeywell's New HTF7350 Engine To Power Bombardier Challenger 350

HTF7000 Series Surpasses 1.5 Million Flight Hours With Better Than 99 Percent Dispatch Reliability Honeywell has announced that its HTF7350, the latest engine to join its successfu>[...]

Airborne 05.21.13: Cirrus Chute Fails, NASA Record, More NIMBY Nonsense

Also: PC-12 Record, Maule Nation, Cockpit Lockout, 34,000 Airliners Needed, Beechcraft Wins Big Contract You know you're having a bad day when a flight goes so bad that you feel yo>[...]

Helo Crew Missing From Vietnam War Accounted For, Interred At Arlington

Four Buried As A Group May 2 A Navy Pilot, missing from the Vietnam War, has been accounted-for and was buried with full military honors along with his crew. According to the Depar>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.21.13)

Forest Service Smoke Jumpers Smokejumping was first proposed in 1934 by T.V. Pearson, the Forest Service Intermountain Regional Forester, as a means to quickly provide initial atta>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2013 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC