Fri, Sep 30, 2011
Carriers Say Anti-Terrorism Costs Are Taxpayers'
Responsibility
The airline industry, which two years ago was an active
proponent of user fees for general aviation, now finds itself on
the defensive against an Obama administration proposal to jack up
its own user fees by 50 percent to cover bloated airport security
costs. The proposal may bring a more serious look at the
cost/benefit of what is commonly called "security theater."
The administration's expressed goal is to aid in deficit
reduction by making airline passengers pay for 75 percent of the
cost of security, up from the current 50 percent. But the airlines
argue that it's not fair to single out their industry for that
burden, any more than it would be fair to add a security fee to the
prices of boxcutters, shoes or underpants.
Steve Lott of the Air Transport Association tells the
New York Times, "No other mode of
transportation bears the cost of security like the aviation
industry and its passengers. Security should be a federal function,
and it should be funded as such."
Lott also questions oversight of security spending. "The amount
of money that the industry and its passengers have paid to fund
security has soared 50 percent since 2002. Congress has a
responsibility to scrutinize how the money is being spent."
Stephen Lord is director of homeland security issues at the
Government Accountability Office, and backs up Lott's concern. He
notes the infamous air puffer machines which had to be scrapped
because they didn't work, and the $750 million spent on training
and deploying specialized officers to conduct behavioral screening
at airports with no solid evidence the tactic was effective. He
tells the Times, "Usually you validate a concept and then you field
it, but they deployed the program and then they started validating
it, which we have some concerns about."
Bob Poole, director of transportation studies for The Reason
Foundation, says he supports the premise of shifting security costs
from taxpayers to travelers, and predicts it will bring more
attention to excesses in spending on security.
In the meantime, the airlines are on the same page with general
aviation on at least one issue - fighting the President's proposed
$100 per-takeoff user fee on flights using air traffic control
services.
More News
Hazardous Weather Information Summary of significant meteorological information (SIGMET/WS), convective significant meteorological information (convective SIGMET/WST), urgent pilot>[...]
“During last week’s State of the Union address, President Biden spoke passionately about our country’s freedom, future possibilities, and job growth—all att>[...]
“The political soundbites of closing the so-called corporate jet loophole and drastically increasing the jet fuel tax, by nearly five times, does nothing more than harm deman>[...]
Decision Altitude/Decision Height [ICAO Annex 6] A specified altitude or height (A/H) in the precision approach at which a missed approach must be initiated if the required visual >[...]
Internal Failure Of The Autopilot Pitch Servo Actuator That Caused The Autopilot To Command A Nose Down Movement Analysis: The pilot reported an uncommanded nose down pitch trim mo>[...]