Sandel Wins Summary Judgement Against Honeywell In TAWS Lawsuit | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

** AIRBORNE 05.21.13 Aero-TV-- CLICK HERE! ** HD iPad-Friendly Version -- AIRBORNE 05.21.13 **

** AIRBORNE 05.17.13 Aero-TV-- CLICK HERE! ** HD iPad-Friendly Version -- AIRBORNE 05.17.13 **

** AIRBORNE 04.01.13 SPECIAL EDITION of Aero-TV-- CLICK HERE! ** HD iPad-Friendly Version -- AIRBORNE 04.01.13 SPECIAL EDITION **

Sat, Nov 01, 2003

Sandel Wins Summary Judgement Against Honeywell In TAWS Lawsuit

In a statement issued by Sandel Avionics, ANN has learned that a summary judgment issued by the US District Court in Delaware has ruled that Sandel does not infringe on any of Honeywell's Terrain Avoidance Warning System (TAWS) patents, ending more than 17 months of legal action by Honeywell.

Two weeks ago, the same court ruled that more than 20 of Honeywell's other claims relating to the display elements of the same patents were invalid.

Together, the rulings confirm that Sandel is not subject to liability for infringement and faces no risk of damages or injunction due to Honeywell's action. Commenting on the decision rendered by Judge Mary Pat Thynge, Sandel CEO Gerry Block said, "This is absolutely a huge win. My firm belief has always been that Sandel's independently developed technology was unique and innovative, and did not infringe any of Honeywell's patents. This ruling confirms that, and also ensures that aviation customers will have the choice of a better way to display terrain and safety data."

In a reversal of roles, Sandel is now taking Honeywell to trial on the issue of whether Honeywell's remaining patents are actually valid. In addition, Sandel expects to seek an award of attorney's fees from the U.S. District Court based on Honeywell's action, as well as on its misconduct in continuing to press claims that it knew to be without merit.

Honeywell Inc. and Honeywell Intellectual Properties Inc., Honeywell's patent holding company, had alleged that Sandel Avionics Inc. and several other companies infringed Honeywell's patents relating to its Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System (EGPWS), Honeywell's version of TAWS. Honeywell filed the case in May 2002, just days after Sandel announced the FAA certification of its ST3400 Terrain Awareness and Warning System (TAWS).

The FAA had earlier issued a mandate requiring most turbine aircraft to install an FAA certified TAWS by 2005. Honeywell, which had assisted the FAA in preparing the TAWS regulations, subsequently sued a number of other TAWS manufacturers, claiming it held five patents that effectively precluded competition in the TAWS market.

FMI: www.sandel.com

Advertisement

More News

Four Companies Recognized With 2013 EBAA Safety Of Flight Awards

Cited For Focus On Maintaining And Improving Best Practices Four European companies have been recognized for their commitment to safe operations as recipients of the 2013 European >[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Viking Engines--Building A Rep For Alternative SportAv Engines

Rotax Is NOT The Only Player In Sport Aviation Propulsion Ya gotta hand to Viking... in an industry so VERY well dominated by Rotax, it takes some serious talent and extraordinary >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.22.13)

The European Cockpit Association The European Cockpit Association (ECA) was created in 1991 and is the representative body of European pilots at European Union (EU) level. It repre>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.22.13): Known Traffic

With respect to ATC clearances, means aircraft whose altitude, position, and intentions are known to ATC.>[...]

Aero-News: Quote Of The Day (05.22.13)

"(T)he PC-24 is a completely new development – not a 'me too product'." Source: Oscar J. Schwenk, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Pilatus, introducing the company's new>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2013 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC