U.S. Senate: JSF Is Essentially Three Different Airplanes | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Wed, May 18, 2016

U.S. Senate: JSF Is Essentially Three Different Airplanes

Air Force Lt. General Says The Three Variants Are Only About 20-25 Percent 'Common'

From the outside, the three variants of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter look very similar. But they are very different airplanes with very different missions, according to the U.S. Senate, and the head of the JSF program.

In a draft of the Senate's National Defense Authorization Act of 2017, the Senate states: "Despite aspirations for a joint aircraft, the F-35A, F-35B and F-35C are essentially three distinct aircraft, with significantly different missions and capability requirements.”

National Interest online reports that earlier this year, U.S. Air Force lieutenant general Christopher Bogdan, head of the JSF program office, said during a recent seminar that the three variants of the F-35 have only about 20-25 percent of their components in common. Air Force Magazine reported that Brogen said it is "almost like three separate production lines." A true JSF is difficult, he said, because each branch insists on its unique requirements.

The language indicating that the aircraft are three airplanes may not make it all the way through the budget process. Similar language may not be included in the House version of the Defense Authorization Act, and therefore not make it into the reconciliation bill.

In its NDAA language, the Senate requires the JSF program office to close by 2019, when the plane should be in full-rate production. It would then be split into three different programs for the Air Force, Navy and Marines. “Devolving this program to the services will help ensure the proper alignment of responsibility and accountability the F-35 program needs and has too often lacked,” the Senate said.

(Images from file)

FMI: www.armed-services.senate.gov


Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.20.24): Light Gun

Light Gun A handheld directional light signaling device which emits a brilliant narrow beam of white, green, or red light as selected by the tower controller. The color and type of>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.20.24)

"The journey to this achievement started nearly a decade ago when a freshly commissioned Gentry, driven by a fascination with new technologies and a desire to contribute significan>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.21.24)

Aero Linx: JAARS, Inc. For decades now, we’ve landed planes on narrow rivers and towering mountains. We’ve outfitted boats and vehicles to reach villages that rarely se>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.21.24)

"Our driven and innovative team of military and civilian Airmen delivers combat power daily, ensuring our nation is ready today and tomorrow." Source: General Duke Richardson, AFMC>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.21.24): Aircraft Conflict

Aircraft Conflict Predicted conflict, within EDST of two aircraft, or between aircraft and airspace. A Red alert is used for conflicts when the predicted minimum separation is 5 na>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC