I Won... No, I Won: Bell, Eurocopter Disagree On Canadian Federal Court Ruling | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Monday

Tuesday

Wednesday

Thursday

Friday

Airborne On ANN

Airborne 05.02.16

Airborne 05.03.16

Airborne 05.04.16

Airborne 05.05.16

Airborne 05.06.16

Airborne Hi-Def On YouTube

Airborne 05.02.16

Airborne 05.03.16

Airborne 05.04.16

Airborne 05.05.16

Airborne 05.06.16

AEA2016 LIVE Aero-TV: 04/27-0830ET, 04/28-1400ET, 04/29-1100ET

Sun 'n Fun 2016 Innovation Preview on Vimeo!

Sun 'n Fun 2016 Innovation Preview on YouTube!

Wed, Feb 01, 2012

I Won... No, I Won: Bell, Eurocopter Disagree On Canadian Federal Court Ruling

Both Companies Say Court Ruled In Their Favor In Landing Skid Dispute

Bell Helicopter and Eurocopter have very different interpretations of a Canadian Federal Court's ruling over a patent infringement case brought by Eurocopter. The two companies issued news releases, and both claim the court ruled in their favor.

Eurocopter said the lengthy January 30th ruling indicated that that Bell Helicopter intentionally infringed a patent of Eurocopter and awarded punitive damages and an injunction to Eurocopter. The patent covers an innovative helicopter landing gear design that Eurocopter developed and implemented on its EC120 and EC130 models.

In its findings, the Court determined that Bell leased a Eurocopter EC120 helicopter equipped with the patented landing gear, studied the design of the gear, and created a “slavish copy” to be used on its new 429 model. Remarkably, when Bell employees raised concerns internally regarding similarities between the Bell landing gear and Eurocopter’s patented design, Bell’s management instructed engineers simply to “carry on.” The Court held that “This is a case of willful blindness or intentional and planned misappropriation [by Bell] of the…invention.”

EC120

Significantly, the Court determined that “Bell has misled and continues to mislead the public into believing that the Bell Model 429 is the first helicopter to use a sleigh type landing gear.” In fact, as the Court found, Bell “decided to import and copy the unique and new patented technology developed by Eurocopter.” Ultimately, the Court concluded that “Bell’s overall conduct is highly reprehensible and constitutes a callous disregard for the rights of Eurocopter.”

Accordingly, the Court found that Eurocopter was entitled to punitive damages due to both Bell’s infringement and its “deliberate and outrageous conduct in this case.” The Court has not yet determined the amount of damages due to Eurocopter. Finally, the Court issued an injunction enjoining Bell from manufacturing, using, or selling the infringing landing gear, and also ordered Bell to destroy all infringing landing gears in its possession. Eurocopter said that as soon as it filed the case, "Bell quickly redesigned the landing gear on the 429 model." The Canadian court held that the redesigned landing gear did not infringe Eurocopter’s Canadian patent.

Bell 429

Bell Helicopter took a different tack, stating in a release that the Canadian Federal Court ruled that the current Bell 429 production skid gear, which was at the center of the case, does not infringe the Eurocopter ‘787 Patent. All Bell 429’s have been and will continue to be delivered with the current production gear. “We are pleased with the court’s ruling that the current Bell 429 production skid gear does not infringe the Eurocopter ‘787 Patent, “ said John L. Garrison, President and CEO of Bell Helicopter. “Integrity is at the core of who we are as a company and what we believe.  Bell Helicopter would never knowingly violate the intellectual property of others.”

The Court found 15 of the 16 claims of Eurocopter’s Canadian patent invalid. The Court did find that one of the 16 claims was valid and was infringed by the original, pre-production sleigh skid gear, however, this original skid gear was never placed into production or sold to a customer. “While we respect the Court’s opinion, based on prior art, we believe that the patent should never have been granted for the sleigh gear design. We are considering an appeal on the findings of both validity and infringement,” said Garrison.

“This ruling is a victory for Bell Helicopter, validating the design of the 429 production skid gear” said Garrison. “We intend to continue to vigorously defend the production gear in the pending infringement suits in the U.S. and France. We believe the Canadian court’s decision provides strong support for our position and remain optimistic that we will obtain positive results in those courts.”

FMI: www.eurocopter.com, www.bellhelicopter.com

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 05.03.16: Solar Impulse 2, SpaceX v Mars, 5000 Section 333 Exemptions

Also: Textron Drone, Aero-Calendar, Aviation Gateway Park, NASA And FAA, R22 Flashcards, MI Av Program, ArcaBoard At the time we put this report together, the Solar Impulse 2 had s>[...]

Airborne 05.03.16: Solar Impulse 2, SpaceX v Mars, 5,000 Section 333 Exemptions

Also: Textron Drone, Aero-Calendar, Aviation Gateway Park, NASA And FAA, R22 Flashcards, MI Av Program, ArcaBoard At the time we put this report together, the Solar Impulse 2 had s>[...]

Airborne 05.02.16: Delta Buys CSeries, Tecnam P2010, Skydiving Competition

Also: Small UAS Rules, Blue Angels/Sully, SpaceX, LOC Accidents, F-35 Program, FlexJet-Flight Options, Airplane Rescue The Bombardier C-Series aircraft program received a major boo>[...]

AD: Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. Airplanes

AD NUMBER: 2016-08-19 PRODUCT: Certain Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. Models MU-2B-30, MU-2B-35, MU-2B-36, MU-2B-36A, and MU-2B-60 airplanes.>[...]

AD: Piper Aircraft, Inc. Airplanes

AD NUMBER: 2016-08-18 PRODUCT: Certain Piper Aircraft, Inc. Model PA-31-350 airplanes.>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2016 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC