Santa Monica Runway TRO Lifted | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Tue, Oct 17, 2017

Santa Monica Runway TRO Lifted

Judge Says City Can Proceed With The Runway Shortening

The City of Santa Monica may proceed with shortening the runway at Santa Monica Airport (KSMO) after a temporary restraining order halting the work was lifted by U.S. District Judge Ronald Lew, who had put it in place.

The Santa Monica Patch reports that Airport Director Stelios Makrides said that the city is pleased with the court's decision, "which allows it to fulfill its commitment to the community and the FAA. The city will renew work on the runway-shortening project, which it expects to commence within the next week, and will continue to update you on matters relating to that project."

The court had put the TRO in place at the request of Santa Monica residents Kate Scott and James Babinski, a pilot. They said that the city had failed to meet public hearing requirements when it made the decision to shorten the runway as part of an overall agreement with the FAA to close the airport entirely by the end of 2028. They also said that shortening the runway would make the airport less safe. Judge Lew said that Scott and Babinski would "likely prevail at trial on the merits of their claim."  He also noted that the city had not filed opposition to the TRO.

Shortly after the order was imposed, the city filed 1,400 pages of documents supporting its case, and requested an expedited review. The city said that the Brown act concerning public hearings did not apply to the runway shortening because it did not require action to be taken. The city said it followed all applicable laws in its decision to shorten the runway. Judge Lew agreed, saying that since the runway shortening project does not involve land acquisition, no public hearing was required. The court also disagreed that safety would be jeopardized after reviewing city and FAA documents.

(Image from file)

FMI: Original Reports Patch

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.20.24): Light Gun

Light Gun A handheld directional light signaling device which emits a brilliant narrow beam of white, green, or red light as selected by the tower controller. The color and type of>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.20.24)

"The journey to this achievement started nearly a decade ago when a freshly commissioned Gentry, driven by a fascination with new technologies and a desire to contribute significan>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.21.24)

Aero Linx: JAARS, Inc. For decades now, we’ve landed planes on narrow rivers and towering mountains. We’ve outfitted boats and vehicles to reach villages that rarely se>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.21.24)

"Our driven and innovative team of military and civilian Airmen delivers combat power daily, ensuring our nation is ready today and tomorrow." Source: General Duke Richardson, AFMC>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.21.24): Aircraft Conflict

Aircraft Conflict Predicted conflict, within EDST of two aircraft, or between aircraft and airspace. A Red alert is used for conflicts when the predicted minimum separation is 5 na>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC