Opening Arguments Begin In 2002 Malibu Accident Trial | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.10.24 Airborne-Unlimited-04.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.12.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Dec 01, 2005

Opening Arguments Begin In 2002 Malibu Accident Trial

Three Died When Plane Went Down After Engine Trouble

Attorneys representing the families of two men who died when their Piper Malibu lost power and crashed shortly after take-off laced their opening arguments in a Naples, FL, courtroom Tuesday with heavy drama, as they outlined their case for damages against a local maintenance shop.

Numbers written on an easel behind plaintiffs' attorneys William DeForest Thompson Jr. and Richard Parks as they made their opening arguments told the jury the scope of the trial: $5,654,426 -- the net amount one of the men killed in the accident, Shawn King, is projected to have earned if he hadn't died at age 31 -- and $2.5 million, the net future earnings of Charles Scherer, Jr. The two men were employed with the same home-building company.

As was reported in Aero-News, the accident also claimed the life of the aircraft's owner and pilot, Cavin Councilor.

Thompson and Parks spent over an hour presenting an overview of their case against Mark London, owner and operator of London Aviation and London Aircraft Service Center. It was London's companies that were responsible for maintenance of the Malibu, including an annual inspection completed prior to the July 2002 accident -- during which time the company replaced two cylinders in the Malibu's engine.

According to the NTSB Probable Cause report on the mishap, the three men arrived at the airport for a flight to St. Petersburg, FL shortly after the mechanic had completed two static tests of the engine during the annual. Attorneys for both sides agree the plane (file photo of type, below) passed both tests, and was deemed airworthy.

The problem, however, occurred almost immediately after the Malibu's wheels left the runway, as the engine lost power at about 300 ft. AGL. Witnesses observed a gray puff of smoke from the aircraft's exhaust as it banked to the right, and stalled.

Investigators believe Councilor was attempting to turn back towards the runway -- a fatal error, as London's attorney, John Murray, stated the airplane may have been able to glide to a landing on the remaining runway.

The NTSB ruled the cause of the accident to be Councilor's "failure to maintain airspeed above the stall speed while maneuvering to land after the engine ceased operating for undetermined reasons, which resulted in a stall/spin, an uncontrolled descent, and an impact with the ground."

"There is no dispute the aircraft lost power. The questions is why," Murray told jurors during opening arguments.

The two prosecuting attorneys say the answer lies in a stain found on the engine block of the wrecked plane, near one of the cylinders that had been replaced. The stain was proven by a lab commissioned by the plaintiffs to be caused by a quick burst of flame -- that the attorneys maintain was caused by a fuel leak from a line that hadn't been properly secured during the replacement.

The evidence, said the two attorneys, shows London Aviation was negligent in its work on the Malibu's engine, and contributed to the accident.

"The reason for the engine quitting is the most important question in this trial. That is the event that took the lives of three people," Parks, the Scherers' attorney, said.

In his response, London's attorney Murray attempted to give jurors reasonable doubt over the plaintiff's theory. He said his experts will show the court the stain in question wasn't recent at the time of the accident.

"The stain was there before this cylinder was changed," Murray said. "You will find there was nothing wrong with this aircraft's engine."

Murray also told jurors he would dispute the dollar amounts the families are seeking -- not just the lost wages described above, but also damages incurred by the men's estates.

The attorney also alleges Councilor's judgment and motor skills were hindered by OTC cold medication found in the pilot's system.

FMI: Read the NTSB Probable Cause Report

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.13.24)

Aero Linx: Florida Antique Biplane Association "Biplanes.....outrageous fun since 1903." That quote really defines what the Florida Antique Biplane Association (FABA) is all about.>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.13.24): Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS)

Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]

Airborne 04.09.24: SnF24!, Piper-DeltaHawk!, Fisher Update, Junkers

Also: ForeFlight Upgrades, Cicare USA, Vittorazi Engines, EarthX We have a number of late-breaking news highlights from the 2024 Innovation Preview... which was PACKED with real ne>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.14.24)

“For Montaer Aircraft it is a very prudent move to incorporate such reliable institution as Ocala Aviation, with the background of decades in training experience and aviation>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.14.24): Maximum Authorized Altitude

Maximum Authorized Altitude A published altitude representing the maximum usable altitude or flight level for an airspace structure or route segment. It is the highest altitude on >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC