Trial Underway For Amwest Pilots Accused Of Trying To Fly Drunk | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.20.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.28.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-05.29.24 Airborne-Unlimited-05.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.24.24

Wed, May 18, 2005

Trial Underway For Amwest Pilots Accused Of Trying To Fly Drunk

Prosecutors Say They Drank "Copious Amounts"

It could be one of the most ballyhooed trials in commercial aviation history -- the case of two America West pilots accused of trying to fly drunk almost two years ago.

Since then, Captain Thomas Cloyd and First Officer Christopher Hughes have been free on $100,000 bond each. They're charged in federal court with operating an aircraft while under the influence of alcohol. If convicted, they could both face five years in prison.

As ANN has reported, the two men were passing through airport security in Miami when a TSA worker noticed the strong odor of alcohol. There was an argument when one of the pilots tried to carry a prohibited cup of coffee into the concourse. Later, according to police reports, the two pilots said they'd had "too many pints" of beer at a Miami sports bar during their night of revelry that didn't end until 0330 the morning before the flight. When administered breathalyzer tests, both pilots reportedly showed more than .08 percent blood-alcohol content.

But they say they're not guilty.

Cloyd and Hughes figure it this way: their flight from Miami to Phoenix was halted while the Airbus was being towed from the gate. They never had control of the aircraft. In other words, you can't be convicted of drunk driving if you never put the car in gear.

There is no method of steering, operating or controlling the airplane while the steering system is disconnected,'' attorneys for the pilots said, as quoted by the Associated Press.

But prosecutors are ready for that argument. They contend Cloyd and Hughes had "the capacity to operate the vehicle, regardless of whether or not [they were] operating the vehicle at the time of the alleged offense.'' That's right out of the book.

Jury selection was expected to continue Wednesday.

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.29.24)

Aero Linx: International Association of Professional Gyroplane Training (IAPGT) We are an Association of people who fly, build or regulate Gyroplanes, who have a dream of a single >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.29.24): NORDO (No Radio)

NORDO (No Radio) Aircraft that cannot or do not communicate by radio when radio communication is required are referred to as “NORDO.”>[...]

Airborne 05.28.24: Jump Plane Down, Starship's 4th, Vision Jet Problems

Also: uAvionix AV-Link, F-16 Viper Demo, TN National Guard, 'Staff the Towers' A Saturday afternoon jump run, originating from SkyDive Kansas City, went bad when it was reported th>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.30.24): Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS)

Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC